Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Mesozoic
Paleozoic
Neoproterozoic
Mesoproterozoic
Paleoproterozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Olpad Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Olpad Fm base reconstruction

Olpad Fm


Period: 
Paleogene

Age Interval: 
Paleocene to Early Eocene


Province: 
W.India Cambay Basin

Type Locality and Naming

SUBSURFACE: Olpad Well -1A (depth interval 1468 m to 2443 m). [Original Publication: Chandra, P.K. and Chowdhary, L.R. (1969) Stratigraphy of the Cambay Basin, ONGC Bulletin, Vol 6 (2), pp: 202-203.]

Synonyms: Initially the formation as represented by volcanic trap wash or trap wacke, was recognized in eastern margin outcrops near Vagadkhol village (Sudhakar and Roy, 1959), though no type section was defined. Rao (1969) and Chandra and Chowdhary (1969) have referred to this formation as the Olpad Formation with the designated type section in Olpad well-1A. Later workers have followed the same nomenclature. However, Sudhakar and Basu (1973) proposed a new name 'Vagadkhol Formation' for this unit. Roy-Choudhary et al. (1972) proposed the name 'Balutri Formation' for the conglomerate sequence overlying the Deccan Traps Fm with Serau East-1 as type section. The name 'Olpad Formation' has been preferred by Pandey et al., (1993) due to its priority in subsurface and popularity in usage.


Lithology and Thickness

Volcaniclastics. In the type section, it comprises of volcanic conglomerate, sandstone, silt, shale, claystone, and clays exclusively derived from basalts.

Sudhakar and Basu (1973) have divided the Olpad into two lithosomes with varying degrees of intermixture: Grey and mottled claystone lithosome and trap conglomerate-sandstone lithosome. Pandey et al., (1993) have divided the Olpad Formation into three lithosomes; the upper sandstone lithosome, middle claystone lithosome, and the lower trap lithosome. In one exploratory well, the Olpad Formation is subdivided into three members: (i) Trapwash Member, (ii) Claystone Member, and (iii) Nawagam Member.

Maximum thickness is 1778 m in Jambusar P-I

[Figure 2: Generalized stratigraphy of the Cambay Basin. (from Jaiswal and Bhattacharya, 2018, J.EarthSyst.Sci., 127:65)]


Lithology Pattern: 
Volcanic_ash


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The formation unconformably overlies the Deccan Traps Fm.

Upper contact

It has gradational and intertonguing relationship with overlying younger Cambay Fm shale.

Regional extent

The formation is mostly developed in subsurface Cambay Basin.


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[71.47,24.96],[72.04,25.03],[72.95,23.89],[73.42,22.76],[73.38,22.06],[72.46,21.01],[71.47,24.96]]]]}}

Fossils

Poorly fossiliferous and the fauna (after Pandey et al., 1993) recorded are thin-walled fresh water gastropods, bivalves shells and chitinous plates. Palynoflora recorded from this formation includes Proxapertites microreticulatus, Dicolpopollis sp; Proxapertites assamicus Monocolpopollanites sp; Polypodisporites sp; Laevigatosporites sp; and Cyathidites sp.


Age 

Paleocene to Early Eocene age has been assigned based on palynofossils and indirect stratigraphic methods (Pandey et al., 1993).

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Thanetian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.05

    Beginning date (Ma): 
59.08

    Ending stage: 
Lutetian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.05

    Ending date (Ma):  
47.72

Depositional setting


Depositional pattern:  

Additional Information


Compiler:  

D.S.N Raju